Accounts Payable Audit: Search for Unrecorded Liabilities
How to audit accounts payable: why completeness is the main risk, the key procedures, and how to run the search for unrecorded liabilities step by step.
Read more →A three-way match is an accounts payable control. Before an invoice is paid, someone (or the system) checks that three documents agree: the purchase order, the receiving report, and the vendor invoice. If they agree, the company is paying for something it ordered, at the price it agreed, that actually arrived.
| Document | Who creates it | What it proves |
|---|---|---|
| Purchase order (PO) | The buyer, approved by someone with authority | The purchase was authorized, at this price and quantity |
| Receiving report (or goods received note) | The warehouse or the person who received the service | The goods or services actually arrived, in this quantity |
| Vendor invoice | The supplier | What the supplier is asking to be paid |
Most companies set a tolerance, for example 2% or $100, so small differences do not stop payment. Anything above the tolerance goes to someone for approval.
Three documents that happen to mention the same vendor are not a three-way match. The documents have to describe the same purchase.
Auditors meet the three-way match in two ways.
If the audit plan relies on the AP control, the auditor tests whether it operated all year. Typical attributes for each sample item:
Our test of controls guide covers sample sizes and what to do when an attribute fails.
When vouching expenses or AP, the auditor uses the same documents as support: the PO for authorization, the receiving report for occurrence and cut-off, and the invoice for amount. The receiving report date is the key to cut-off: goods received before year end belong in this year's liabilities even if the invoice arrives in January. See vouching vs tracing and our guide to the accounts payable audit.
Warp vouches GL and AP samples to the client's invoices, purchase orders and receipts. Each result shows which fields agree and which do not, and links to the page in the document it came from, so the reviewer can check a match in seconds. See test of details in Warp.
Want to talk about this?
How to audit accounts payable: why completeness is the main risk, the key procedures, and how to run the search for unrecorded liabilities step by step.
Read more →The three stages of analytical procedures in an audit, what AU-C 520 and ISA 520 require, and how to build an expectation precise enough to count as evidence.
Read more →The financial statement assertions under AU-C 315, ISA 315 and PCAOB AS 1105, what each one means, and the audit procedures that test it.
Read more →