← Blog

    Audit Confirmations: Bank, Receivables and Payables

    Warp team · November 4, 2026

    An external confirmation is a written answer that comes straight to the auditor from a third party: a bank, a customer, a supplier, a lender. Because it comes from outside the client and reaches the auditor directly, it is some of the strongest evidence in an audit.

    The standards are AU-C 505 (private companies), ISA 505 and CAS 505, and AS 2310 for public companies.

    What gets confirmed

    AreaTypical confirmation
    CashBalances, loans and other arrangements with each bank
    Accounts receivableCustomer balances or specific invoices
    Accounts payableSupplier balances, especially small and zero balances, for completeness
    DebtBalance, rate, terms and covenants with lenders
    LegalLitigation and claims, through the lawyer's letter
    Inventory held by othersGoods at a third-party warehouse

    For receivables, AU-C 330 requires confirmation unless the balance is immaterial, confirmations would not work (for example, customers who never reply), or the risk is low and other procedures cover it. If you skip it, document why.

    Positive or negative requests

    • Positive: the third party is asked to reply in every case, either confirming the balance or giving the right one. Use these where risk is meaningful.
    • Negative: the third party replies only if they disagree. Silence is weak evidence, so negative requests are only appropriate when risk is low, there are many small balances, and you expect few exceptions.

    Keep control of the process

    The evidence is only as good as the route it takes.

    1. The auditor sends the request, not the client.
    2. Check the addresses and contacts yourself, against independent sources, not just the client's list.
    3. Replies come back to the auditor, directly. An email forwarded by the client is not a confirmation.
    4. Electronic platforms are fine if you are satisfied the process and the respondent are genuine.

    Non-responses and alternative procedures

    When a positive request gets no answer after a follow-up, do alternative procedures for that balance:

    • Receivables: check cash received after year end against the specific invoices in the balance, and inspect the invoices, shipping documents and contracts behind them.
    • Payables: inspect vendor statements, invoices and payments made after year end. See the accounts payable audit.

    Exceptions

    An exception is a reply that does not agree with the client's records. Investigate every one. Many are timing differences (a payment in transit, an invoice received after year end), but each needs evidence. Exceptions caused by errors may point to a wider problem in the account.

    If management refuses to let you send a confirmation, ask why and look for evidence that supports the reason. An unreasonable refusal is a fraud risk factor and may need to go to those charged with governance.

    Where Warp Accounting fits

    Warp Accounting does not send or receive confirmations. Where alternative procedures mean inspecting the invoices and payments behind a balance, it matches those documents to the ledger entries, checks amounts and dates, and links each conclusion to the source page. See test of details, and our guides to vouching vs tracing and audit evidence.

    Want to talk about this?

    More posts